1969 Volkswagen 1600 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Volkswagen 1600 | 2005 Volkswagen Caddy | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volkswagen |
| Model | 1600 | Caddy |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
