1969 Volkswagen 1600 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Volkswagen 1600 | 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Volkswagen | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 71 L |