1969 Volvo 120 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 120. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 120.
Because 1969 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Volvo 120. (158 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Volvo 120 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Volvo | Toyota |
Model | 120 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |