1969 Volvo 164 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (145 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 164. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 220 kg more than 1969 Volvo 164. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Volvo 164 | 1997 Acura CL | |
| Make | Volvo | Acura |
| Model | 164 | CL |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2715 mm |
