1969 Volvo P 210 Duett vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 2 (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett weights approximately 172 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Volvo P 210 Duett | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Volvo | Mazda |
| Model | P 210 Duett | 2 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.2 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 43 L |
