1969 Zastava 1500 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (148 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 655 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1969 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1969 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: