1969 Zastava 1500 vs. 2012 Audi A4
To start off, 2012 Audi A4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A4 (175 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500.
Because 1969 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Zastava 1500 | 2012 Audi A4 | |
Make | Zastava | Audi |
Model | 1500 | A4 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |