1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 1990 Ford Corsair
To start off, 1990 Ford Corsair is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,974 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Corsair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Corsair (111 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Corsair should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Corsair weights approximately 275 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Corsair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 1990 Ford Corsair | |
| Make | Zastava | Ford |
| Model | 850 K | Corsair |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 1974 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2560 mm |
