1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 1991 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1991 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 225 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Zastava 850 K | 1991 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Zastava | Nissan |
Model | 850 K | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1969 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 846 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2440 mm |