1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,177 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 (247 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
| Make | Zastava | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 850 K | 166 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 3177 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2550 mm |
