1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2004 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2004 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 ZAZ Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 ZAZ Wagon (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 850 K weights approximately 110 kg more than 2004 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2004 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Zastava | ZAZ |
| Model | 850 K | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 1091 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2330 mm |
