1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 771 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX weights approximately 325 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2009 Koenigsegg CCX | |
| Make | Zastava | Koenigsegg |
| Model | 850 K | CCX |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 4719 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 806 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2660 mm |
