1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Civic weights approximately 465 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2010 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Zastava | Honda |
| Model | 850 K | Civic |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 1799 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1785 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
