1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 6,208 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (518 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 483 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 385 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Zastava | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 850 K | SL |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 6208 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 518 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2570 mm |
