1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 859 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
| Model | 850 K | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2858 mm |
