1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura TL weights approximately 945 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2012 Acura TL | |
| Make | Zastava | Acura |
| Model | 850 K | TL |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4928 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2776 mm |
