1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Armada (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1797 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Zastava | Nissan |
| Model | 850 K | Armada |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 5600 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 313 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1981 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3130 mm |
