1969 ZAZ 966 vs. 1979 Honda Prelude
To start off, 1979 Honda Prelude is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,602 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Honda Prelude is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Honda Prelude weights approximately 180 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Honda Prelude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 ZAZ 966 | 1979 Honda Prelude | |
Make | ZAZ | Honda |
Model | 966 | Prelude |
Year Released | 1969 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 887 cc | 1602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2330 mm |