1969 ZAZ 966 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 ZAZ 966 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | ZAZ | Holden |
| Model | 966 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 887 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2700 mm |
