1969 ZAZ 966 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1969 ZAZ 966 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | ZAZ | Chevrolet |
Model | 966 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 887 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2852 mm |