1969 ZIL 114 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 7,962 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1969 ZIL 114. (254 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1419 kg more than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1969 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1969 ZIL 114 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | ZIL | Cadillac |
Model | 114 | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7962 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 580 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 3175 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3770 mm | 2880 mm |