1970 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,598 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1970 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1970 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Abarth 1300. (130 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | CTS |
Year Released | 1970 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1279 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2890 mm |