1970 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1970 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1970 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1970 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Abarth 1300. (130 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | BLS |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1279 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2680 mm |