1970 AC 428 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1970 AC 428. (298 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1970 AC 428. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 AC 428 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 AC 428 (640 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Mustang. (556 Nm). This means 1970 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1970 AC 428 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | 428 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7003 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 298 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 556 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |