1970 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1966 Austin A 40
To start off, 1970 Alfa Romeo 1750 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Alfa Romeo 1750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Alfa Romeo 1750 (123 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Alfa Romeo 1750 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1966 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 1750 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 47 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |