1970 Alfa Romeo GTA vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk

To start off, 1970 Alfa Romeo GTA is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,247 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 610 kg more than 1970 Alfa Romeo GTA.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1970 Alfa Romeo GTA 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
Make Alfa Romeo Studebaker
Model GTA Sky Hawk
Year Released 1970 1956
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1290 cc 4247 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 93 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 790 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4090 mm 5150 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2980 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]