1970 Alpine A 110 vs. 1984 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1984 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1970 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1970 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 290 kg more than 1970 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Alpine A 110 | 1984 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A 110 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1970 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2420 mm |