1970 AMC Ambassador vs. 1963 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1970 AMC Ambassador is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC Ambassador (210 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC Ambassador should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 AMC Ambassador weights approximately 670 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 AMC Ambassador (414 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1970 AMC Ambassador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300. 1970 AMC Ambassador has automatic transmission and 1963 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1963 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 AMC Ambassador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: