1970 AMC AMX III vs. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II
To start off, 1970 AMC AMX III is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | |
| Make | AMC | Austin-Healey |
| Model | AMX III | 3000 Mk II |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 105.9 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.7 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2340 mm |
