1970 AMC AMX III vs. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | AMC | Daewoo |
| Model | AMX III | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 202 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
