1970 AMC AMX III vs. 1996 Kia Avella
To start off, 1996 Kia Avella is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 254 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Avella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 AMC AMX III | 1996 Kia Avella | |
Make | AMC | Kia |
Model | AMX III | Avella |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 341 HP | 87 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2400 mm |