1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 252 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1970 AMC AMX III has manual transmission. 1970 AMC AMX III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | AMC | Ford |
| Model | AMX III | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 89 HP |
| Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2730 mm |
