1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1970 AMC AMX III. (341 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1970 AMC AMX III.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 1970 AMC AMX III has manual transmission. 1970 AMC AMX III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | AMC | Lincoln |
| Model | AMX III | Continental |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 410 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
