1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 291 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | AMC | ZAZ |
| Model | AMX III | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 105.9 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.7 mm | 67 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2330 mm |
