1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | AMC | Cadillac |
| Model | AMX III | CTS |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 105.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.7 mm | 88 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2890 mm |
