1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 281 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 AMC AMX III | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | AMC | Volkswagen |
Model | AMX III | Polo |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 341 HP | 60 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 105.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.7 mm | 95.5 mm |
Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |