1970 AMC Gremlin vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1970 AMC Gremlin is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1970 AMC Gremlin. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1970 AMC Gremlin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1024 kg more than 1970 AMC Gremlin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 AMC Gremlin | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Gremlin | 62 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |