1970 AMC Gremlin vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 AMC Gremlin is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 AMC Gremlin is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1970 AMC Gremlin. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1970 AMC Gremlin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 19 kg more than 1970 AMC Gremlin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 AMC Gremlin (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1970 AMC Gremlin will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1970 AMC Gremlin | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AMC | Triumph |
Model | Gremlin | 2000 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |