1970 AMC Gremlin vs. 1977 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1977 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC Gremlin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC Gremlin would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 AMC Gremlin is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 AMC Gremlin weights approximately 315 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 AMC Gremlin (251 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 AMC Gremlin will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC Gremlin | 1977 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | AMC | Mazda |
| Model | Gremlin | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1167 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
