1970 AMC Gremlin vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC Gremlin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC Gremlin would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 733 more horse power than 1970 AMC Gremlin. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1970 AMC Gremlin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 AMC Gremlin weights approximately 90 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 725 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 AMC Gremlin. (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 AMC Gremlin.
Compare all specifications:
1970 AMC Gremlin | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | AMC | Lotec |
Model | Gremlin | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1150 mm |