1970 AMC Gremlin vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC Gremlin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC Gremlin would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 AMC Gremlin is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1970 AMC Gremlin. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1970 AMC Gremlin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 AMC Gremlin weights approximately 42 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 AMC Gremlin (251 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1970 AMC Gremlin will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

1970 AMC Gremlin 2009 Mazda RX-8
Make AMC Mazda
Model Gremlin RX-8
Year Released 1970 2009
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3800 cc 1307 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 100 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 8500 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 216 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 5500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1167 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 4100 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 64 L