1970 Audi 100 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1970 Audi 100. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 203 kg more than 1970 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi 100. (163 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi 100 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1871 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1082 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |