1970 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2009 Ford Bantam is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,871 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Audi 100 (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Audi 100 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2009 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Audi 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Audi 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Audi 100 (163 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Bantam. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1970 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi 100 | 2009 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 100 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1871 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1082 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 54 L |