1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1970 Audi Super 90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Audi Super 90 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Audi | Reliant |
| Model | Super 90 | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2290 mm |
