1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 1966 BMW 1602
To start off, 1970 Audi Super 90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,759 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Audi Super 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Audi Super 90 (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Audi Super 90 should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Audi Super 90 (149 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm). This means 1970 Audi Super 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Super 90 | 1966 BMW 1602 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | Super 90 | 1602 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 1574 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 130 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.3 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.6:1 |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 159 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |