1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 1972 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1972 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 1,759 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Audi Super 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Toyota Celica (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Audi Super 90 (149 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Toyota Celica. (137 Nm). This means 1970 Audi Super 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Super 90 | 1972 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | Super 90 | Celica |
Year Released | 1970 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.3 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2430 mm |