1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Because 1970 Audi Super 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Audi Super 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Super 90 | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | Super 90 | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2350 mm |