1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2002 Holden Astra
To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Astra (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Because 1970 Audi Super 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Audi Super 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Astra (165 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 2002 Holden Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Audi Super 90 | 2002 Holden Astra | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | Super 90 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1759 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |
