1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 1,759 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Audi Super 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Audi Super 90 (149 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1970 Audi Super 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Super 90 | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | Super 90 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2210 mm |