1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 759 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 841 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Audi Super 90 | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Audi | Lotec |
| Model | Super 90 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1759 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 844 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1150 mm |
